15 Jul 2009
math.RT
arxiv.org/abs/0907.2675

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

- Slava Naprienko

Log in to leave a comment.

Slava Naprienko

There is a minor typo: in **Theorem 4.5**, the term $k'$ is actually the product of $e_{-\alpha_k}(y_k)$ and $e_{\alpha_k}(y_k)h_{\alpha_k}(y_k^{-1})e_{\alpha}(y_k^{-1})$, but in the displayed equation it shows the *inverses* of such terms. This explicit form is used, for example, in this paper, Theorem 3.3.

Log in to leave a review.

Slava NaprienkoCorollary 8.7is actually non-trivial and follows from the bijection between Lusztig parametrization of the canonical basis and the BZL strings.